|
Discussion Document
October 2005
Previous Page /
Table of Contents /
Next Page
The
Problem
14. Early in the investigation the Ministry obtained test
reports from suppliers to ensure compliance with
BS 1970. Test reports
were received from suppliers that were approximately 3 years
old. Discussions with testing facilities advised they would no
longer stand by a test report that was more than 12 months
from the issue date due to the variables in rubber production
and the manufacture of hot water bottles.
15. The internationally recognised standard for hot water
bottles is BS 1970:2001
Hot water bottles manufactured from rubber and
PVC. Specification.
The 2001 version is the current version which superseded the
1984 edition and BS
6728-1:1986 Thermoplastics hot water bottles. Specification
for hot water bottles manufactured from
PVC compounds.
16. The rubber hot water bottles sighted by the Ministry
were marked with various markings:
- Unmarked;
- Marked as complying to BS1970:1984;
- Marked as complying to BS1970:
2001;
- Marked as complying to BS
1999. (BS 1999:1964
Specification for tritolyl phosphate does not apply to hot
water bottles.)
17. Hot water bottles are made from either rubber or
PVC. The problem with
hot water bottles splitting has only occurred with those made
from rubber. The PVC
hot water bottles that have been sighted by the Ministry are
in the top end of the market with a retail price starting at
approximately $15.00.
18. Consultation with the Australasian Rubber and Plastics
Association, based in Australia, established that the rubber
compound most rubber bottles were made of can vary. They
advised that rubber is a combination of many ingredients,
selected to perform a specific function. This is known as a
rubber compound. A rubber compound can be designed to
withstand the effects of boiling water for very long periods
of time, as is required for hot water bottles. If the right
ingredients are not selected then the product will not perform
as expected. The Australasian Rubber and Plastics Association
also advised that boiling water can lead to deterioration in
the rubber that would lead to a product splitting. They also
added that a manufacturing fault could also have the same
outcome.
International
19. In assessing the options available for addressing the
safety issues, the Ministry is expected to take into account
the wider perspective of government and the global environment
in which trade takes place.
20. Interventions that act as trade barriers have to be
avoided. Nevertheless, a commitment to free trade has to be
balanced by the need to ensure that consumer safety is not
compromised.
Australia
21. Australian authorities are also receiving complaints
about rubber hot water bottles, and are awaiting the New
Zealand outcome and considering a product ban. South Australia
in particular has had a fatality from a burst rubber hot water
bottle.
22. New South Wales has conducted tests on 18 bottles in
accordance with the minimum thicknesses as stated in
BS 1970:2001. Out of the
18 rubber hot water bottles, 15 failed, 5 marginally passed
the minimum thickness, leaving only 2 bottles tested with a
margin for error.
Previous Page
/ Table of Contents /
Next Page
|