|
Discussion Paper
July 2005
Previous Page /
Table of Contents /
Next Page
Introduction
A review of the role of the Ministry
of Consumer Affairs,[1]
which examined the role and scope of consumer policy and
identified key strategic issues that may influence or impact
on the outcomes of the Ministry in the next five to ten years,
was completed in May 2003. The review recommended that the
Ministry initiate a first-principles review of self-regulation
and the Ministry's involvement in it.
A further recommendation was that self-regulation should be
considered as part of a review of the mix of approaches to
redress and enforcement that will best contribute to the
Ministry's outcome of consumers transacting with confidence.
The purpose of this review is to assist industry, consumers
and government in developing, operating and evaluating
industry-led regulatory schemes, such as voluntary codes of
conduct and consumer dispute resolution schemes.
This review will consider whether industry-led schemes are
effective in promoting an environment in which consumers
transact with confidence, and to clarify the circumstances in
which such schemes work best.
This review builds on previous work undertaken by the
Ministry on self-regulation (including the Ministry's
publication Codes of Practice - Guidelines for
Developing a Code of Practice), as well as examining
other material from New Zealand and overseas.
The key issues to be addressed in the review are:
- Assessing current trends in regulatory practice in New
Zealand and overseas - how do industry-led schemes fit
within the overall regulatory environment?
- How effective are industry-led schemes in creating an
environment in which consumers transact with confidence:
- What is an appropriate evaluation framework to assist
industries, consumers and government in assessing whether
schemes are effective in practice?
- Applying the evaluation framework in a case study
analysis of selected schemes to determine whether the
schemes are successful in creating an environment in which
consumers can transact with confidence
- From the case studies, developing a set of best
practice principles. These principles will cover issues
such as the circumstances in which industry-led regulation
is likely to be most effective.
- Are there gaps in the coverage of schemes?
- To what extent should the government be involved in
self-regulation?
Outline of This Paper
The purpose of this paper is to provide the background
context to the review, to outline the industry circumstances
which have been identified overseas as being indicative of
effective industry-led regulation, and to develop a framework
for evaluating industry-led regulatory schemes. The paper
begins by considering the importance of an effective and
efficient regulatory environment in achieving the Ministry's
goals of promoting economic development and creating confident
consumers.
It then goes on to describe a model of the regulatory
environment which incorporates the different forms of
regulatory instruments, including alternative and
complementary schemes, and the interaction of these
instruments.
Part 2 considers the linkages between an effective
regulatory environment and confident consumers and develops
them into a draft framework for evaluating industry-led
regulation. The draft evaluation framework will form the basis
of a number of case studies of schemes currently operating in
New Zealand. The case studies will not be seeking to "tick" or
"cross" whether a scheme is successful or not, but will lead
to a more general identification of the features which are
present in successful schemes. This will lead to the
development of best practice principles for developing and
operating a scheme.
A subsequent paper, to be released later in 2005, will
examine the appropriate role for government in participating
in industry-led regulation. It will consider various models
adopted by governments overseas, and whether one of these
models, or a hybrid, is appropriate for New Zealand.
In addition to this review of self-regulation, the Ministry
has also launched a review of the enforcement of consumer
protection law.
Previous Page
/ Table of Contents /
Next Page
|